Writing Accountability:

 

 

K-5 District and Building Procedures

 

Writing is an integral part of the ELA curriculum and as such is worthy of a system of accountability across our District.  To that end this outline addresses district components of writing accountability but clearly recognizes that individual schools might add site-based components to the district piece.

 

Our expectation is that all K-5 students will be taught writing using the stated steps of the Writing Process.  These steps - Pre-Writing, Drafting, Editing, Revising, Publishing -shall be posted in each classroom.  This vocabulary shall not be changed to ensure continuity across the district.  Teachers will follow their grade level scope & sequence with integrity for writing instruction.

 

Writers need feedback in order to understand their writing strengths and the areas in which they can improve.  “Good job” or “You can do better” do not provide enough information to enable writers to focus on important aspects of good writing.  Rubrics allow for precise feedback, so writers can develop self-monitoring skills and understand their writing strengths and areas in which they can improve.

 

Once the Process is in place the requirements of the district are:

 

 

 

 

 

It is the recommendation of the District that these benchmark pieces be collected through the years and presented to the students as they complete Grade 5.  This will create a memorable writing portfolio for students graduating from elementary school.

 

 

Benchmark Writing Samples - Guidelines K-5

 

 

  1. Students will follow the steps of the writing process for these benchmark writing samples.  The prompt is assigned by the site but must be the same for all classes at grade level.  It is possible for multiple grades to have the same prompt at each site.

 

  1. No teacher editing is to be done on these writing samples.  The students should be self editing only.  However, at the K-1 grade level, teachers are allowed to prompt students to include more details.  Verbal prompting can not be dictated information to the students.  An example of an appropriate prompt might be, “Can you tell me more about this trip to the zoo?”  An example of an unacceptable prompt might be “Tell me about the monkeys and lions at the zoo.”

 

  1. Final writing samples should be submitted upon completion of the publishing step.  We want the best handwriting, with no computer generated pieces.  This is in line with MCAS samples.

 

  1. All benchmark samples must be submitted according to set timelines.  It is the responsibility of teachers to ensure that if a student is absent or registers after set dates a benchmark piece is done as soon as possible.

 

  1. The winter benchmarking writing samples will be sent to the District Office to be scored using the grade-level rubrics developed by the District Writing Committee.  They will be returned to the principal of the building.  Data from the student scores will be tabulated and analyzed for the purpose of tracking student achievement and determining professional development needs for teaches in the area of writing.

 

  1. Fall and Spring benchmark writing samples will be scored by teachers before submitting to the building principal.

 

 

Return to Chicopee Home Page Return to Writing Process:  June 2008 handbook homepage